I'm terrified right now...

[PF-Grumpy]

... to respond to any threads about anything. And I'm sorta not kidding.

[Pusher]

I was kinda thinking the same thing.

I'm going to tempt fate and post in the discussion thread, not the petition thread, but not the discussion, not petition thread, the other one that isn't closed. Wish me luck.

[Radardog]

Heh, I was just mentioning something in PMs about that exact feeling.

Big brother sure is active today.

... and ironically on a slow day in landroval terms.

[Sujae]

Time to start talking about puppy dogs and ***** cats, thats always a safe topic.

[AdarinOuest]

/reported



Seriously though, all of these are very reasonable and I'm glad they're finally cracking down on the infractions some people have been getting away with for awhile.

[Sujae]

Errrr....kitty kats, lol

[AdarinOuest]

Time to start talking about puppy dogs and ***** cats, thats always a safe topic.

What kind of cats?

[PF-Grumpy]

Seriously though, all of these are very reasonable and I'm glad they're finally cracking down on the infractions some people have been getting away with for awhile.

Suck up .

[Thane9]

Time to start talking about puppy dogs and ***** cats, thats always a safe topic.

NO!!! We already have the Nom thread...we can't talk about dogs and cats in this thread...it'd be a duplicate!!!

[AdarinOuest]

Suck up .

A list of infractions that were enforced...
Cross-linking of threads from other forums.

Supporting traffic of a petition thread when there are no petitions allowed on the forums.

Discussing moderator actions/infractions/etc. by opening a thread ABOUT a closed thread.

I mean these are pretty cut and dried.

[Frelorn]

We have no issue with anyone discussing various topics, but starting a thread to say "hey lets discuss this thread over there" is not acceptable and I have closed multiple threads just like that today.

The whole point is that if one thread on the topic has been started, there is no need to start another thread linking to the previous thread.