A
team is strongly represented by the word
common. A team is linked for a
common purpose, they have a
common goal and they themselves as individuals have much in common. However it is imperative that they be multifarious. Regarding composition, all teams will have an element of homogeneity and heterogeneity. The more homogeneous the group, the more cohesive it will be. The more heterogeneous the group, the greater the differences in perspective and increased potential for creativity, but also the greater potential for conflict.
I believe there is more to comprehend than people are seeing regarding the disconsolate state and crestfallen comments about the chosen. The selection process resulted in individuals who have all
(typically) the same thing in common:
- Wise - (30's and above) have family's and have had as Sapience said, "many walks of life."
- Kind - They seem to put others first and are very considerate of others, this suggests a frictionless feedback environment
- Diverse - There are many play styles represented and all of the players are very active and have a strong history
I guess what I am saying is that
Turbine picked the perfect people and they did an excellent job, however, they failed to
add that which makes a team
constructive. People that are:
- Opinionated - Are open to criticism and stating the obvious, this suggests a little more drama - the opportunity cost that leads to constructiveness.
- Knowledgeable - More familiar with how the game itself works (combat focused). While this game does involve a strong element of crafting, leveling, legendary items and so forth combat is what it is geared towards.
Please do not misunderstand that I'm saying members of the council aren't opinionated or knowledgeable, rather this is not their most dominant attribute
I have read both applications forms of 3 people that got in and 3 "hardcore raiders" that didn't.The
elected wrote a paragraph form of their interests, intent, and who they were as in individual. The
raiders bulleted their accomplishments and eligibility and the required fill in lines. I fully understand the elector reading through applications and thinking to himself: "Wow this guy is full of himself", or "Wow this person is a wonderful individual". I guess what I'm trying to say is a "hardcore raider" would probably make Sapience drink another coffee in the morning .
My point of this post is please do not take our comments of criticism to mean specifically that we do not approve of who is there. Rather it is not complete. Would it be too much to ask for at least 1 known US and EU player from a raiding kinship who isn't too opinionated to be added to set our mind at ease? We at least know then he/she is viewing suggestions made by others.