We have detected that cookies are not enabled on your browser. Please enable cookies to ensure the proper experience.
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Old posts

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    60

    Old posts

    Any plans on restoring the posts from the old forums? I keep finding threads when I search that aren't there when i click on them. Feel like I'm missing out on info that got pruned from the old forum.
    [charsig=http://lotrosigs.level3.turbine.com/022040000000fdcf4/01008/signature.png]Pwylldis[/charsig]
    Prancing Pwnies: Pwylldis, Cuchulin, Llewallen, Cernunos, Aywell, Dolos, Ambisagrus
    Spirit Brewers: Ngetal, Gwionbach
    Tricksie Little Hobbitses: Johnnyrotten, Quixlac, Vivo

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    35,979

    Re: Old posts

    I doubt it. Turbine periodically has a house cleaning. Deletes old posts. Turbine has deleted many more posts than are currently on their forum. Most forums have periodic deletions to improve performance and free up space unless they are very small - not very active.

    I think Turbine cleans house every six to nine months. Anything you want kept - Turbine suggests putting in the Lore Book. The forums are temporary storage.
    Unless stated otherwise, all content in this post is My Personal Opinion.

  3. #3
    Sapience is offline Former Community Manager & Harbinger of Soon
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,817

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by dabda81 View Post
    Any plans on restoring the posts from the old forums? I keep finding threads when I search that aren't there when i click on them. Feel like I'm missing out on info that got pruned from the old forum.

    The last forum pruning was over the summer and it removed posts more than about 4-6 months old unless the community had preserved them by making a new entry. They are deleted, so there's no way to restore them.

    With that said we have no plans to prune forums in the future. The new forums and the hardware they are on (yes, it's actually better/faster/stronger) means we are less likely to have performance issues related to very large post histories.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    4,071

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapience View Post

    With that said we have no plans to prune forums in the future. The new forums and the hardware they are on (yes, it's actually better/faster/stronger) means we are less likely to have performance issues related to very large post histories.
    you are joking right?

    we have yet to see ANY evidence of this.

    all we have seen is that the new forums are worse/slower/weaker...


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,558

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Darej View Post
    you are joking right?

    we have yet to see ANY evidence of this.

    all we have seen is that the new forums are worse/slower/weaker...

    I have to agree with Darej here, Sapience. The new forums are slower, harder to read, waste tons of screen real estate, and have the smallest hardest to see emoticons ever. When you can't even get the emoticons right there are serious problems with your forums.

  6. #6

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapience View Post
    With that said we have no plans to prune forums in the future. The new forums and the hardware they are on (yes, it's actually better/faster/stronger)


    really? personal expirience says otherwise.
    The Usual Suspects, if you know us, you know why.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    155

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Darej View Post
    you are joking right?

    we have yet to see ANY evidence of this.

    all we have seen is that the new forums are worse/slower/weaker...

    Quote Originally Posted by Elfheart View Post
    I have to agree with Darej here, Sapience. The new forums are slower, harder to read, waste tons of screen real estate, and have the smallest hardest to see emoticons ever. When you can't even get the emoticons right there are serious problems with your forums.
    Quote Originally Posted by lf2536 View Post
    really? personal expirience says otherwise.
    I have to agree with these folks. The new forums are terrible as far as performance goes.
    Alanras - 65 Hunter, Codeo - 65 Warden, Gavari - Up and coming Champion
    Officer, Hammerfist Clan, Brandywine Server
    HammerfistClan.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    4,784

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapience View Post
    The new forums and the hardware they are on (yes, it's actually better/faster/stronger) means we are less likely to have performance issues related to very large post histories.
    Not on any of the 4 computers I have routine access to, divided between two completely different locations. The new forums are worse/slower/weaker for me.
    << Co-founder of The Firebrands of Caruja on Landroval >>
    Ceolford of Dale, Dorolin, Tordag, Garberend Bellheather, Colfinn Belegorn, Garmo Butterbuckles, Calensarn Nimlos, Langtiriel, Bergteir


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    12,894

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapience View Post
    The last forum pruning was over the summer and it removed posts more than about 4-6 months old unless the community had preserved them by making a new entry. They are deleted, so there's no way to restore them.

    With that said we have no plans to prune forums in the future. The new forums and the hardware they are on (yes, it's actually better/faster/stronger) means we are less likely to have performance issues related to very large post histories.
    An interesting, and rather weird, discovery I had a couple of months ago... the Suggestion forums (at least, didn't bother to investigate further) doesn't seem to be touched by the pruning shears...

    Go to Suggestion forums, click Last and you'll find this thread from March '09.

    http://forums.lotro.com/showthread.p...ved-Trait-Sets

    or this (very "first") from July '08

    http://forums.lotro.com/showthread.p...ved-Trait-Sets
    [COLOR=red][/COLOR]Retired.

  10. #10
    Sapience is offline Former Community Manager & Harbinger of Soon
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5,817

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by JeanCarlo View Post
    An interesting, and rather weird, discovery I had a couple of months ago... the Suggestion forums (at least, didn't bother to investigate further) doesn't seem to be touched by the pruning shears...

    Go to Suggestion forums, click Last and you'll find this thread from March '09.

    http://forums.lotro.com/showthread.p...ved-Trait-Sets

    or this (very "first") from July '08

    http://forums.lotro.com/showthread.p...ved-Trait-Sets
    Because that forum was usually excluded from pruning.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    180

    Re: Old posts

    I have to agree with the above posts... the home page itself takes a quite a while to load (I use Chrome), and when it does finally load the home page it insanely unorganized. Searches are almost pointless when you consider how incredibly long they take and the fact that almost all results you do find lead you back to the main page
    [CENTER][B][COLOR="green"]LANDROVAL[/COLOR][/B]
    [SIZE="1"]Bandiwise ~ Hobbit Burglar - - - Bandielle ~ Hobbit Guardian
    Bandilac ~ Hobbit Warden - - - Bandithil ~ Elf Rune-Keeper[/SIZE]

    [B][COLOR="orange"]NIMRODEL[/COLOR][/B]
    [SIZE="1"]Shroomble ~ Hobbit Minstrel - - - Trufflege ~ Hobbit Hunter[/SIZE][/CENTER]

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    12,894

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Sapience View Post
    Because that forum was usually excluded from pruning.
    Ah, interesting! I guess it was just dumb luck I found that weirdness there lol.
    [COLOR=red][/COLOR]Retired.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    265

    Re: Old posts

    Quote Originally Posted by Darej View Post
    you are joking right?

    we have yet to see ANY evidence of this.

    all we have seen is that the new forums are worse/slower/weaker...

    I agree. I find the "new" forums to be painful and aggravating to use.
    [COLOR=Cyan][B][charsig=http://lotrosigs.level3.turbine.com/08207000000005143/01000/signature.png]Lancelyn[/charsig][/B][/COLOR]

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,008

    Re: Old posts

    Just because the new forums are slower client side (rendering) doesn't mean they are slower server side.

    But yes...from the client side point of view I much preferred the old forums.

    Issues with new layout/forums....
    • Menus break. Menus are hard to click on.
    • Logging in takes me back to the "Forums List". Very annoying when I'm in a post that I want to reply to, but not logged in. I then have to open another window to log in or navigate back to the post...
    • Old Layout was better looking IMO.
    • Time warp is rampant. Posting and then having people quote my post before I posted it...
    • Lost my join date. Argh......
    • Mailbox messages force you to use WYSIWYG editor.. which is junky.


    As far as speed goes... they seem to load fast enough.. but I think the old forum was faster. Probably due to the complicated menu at the top.

    Haven't seen the forums crash yet (personally).

    That all said....I'm sure that someone worked very very hard on getting these new forums setup. And the community appreciates your effort...however there is still a lot of work to be done in order to get the forums operating smoothly. We appreciate your continued effort. Thank you.
    Last edited by Sneezer; Nov 22 2010 at 01:22 PM.

  15. Dec 20 2010, 07:22 PM


 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload