I have seen an increase in false positives myself in recent times. From the virus research perspective there are often new techniques that are being developed based on AI training that may account for this. It is always good to check something you suspect is a false positive with online scanners from different vendors as they all have slightly different algorithms. I also saw a mention of virustotal, which scans against many different vendors for you.
Honestly I would recommend that you try to figure out how to whitelist the executables or folders rather than pausing your active scanning component of your anti-virus unless you aren't searching the Internet or using other media/ad connected apps while it is paused.
It may be a bit of a hassle as you test it out and it keeps getting quarantined until the settings are correct but would be a much safer options. That being said, if you do add the exception you should likely make a note to take it out when their definition files are updated in case the worst should ever happen and a virus does manage to get into the updater repository some day.
But as I think more about it, I would also be curious if you see any improvements in play when it is whitelisted, it just made me think about testing this on my own system once the false positive is confirmed by those scanners that are currently detecting something. Some programs suffer more than others due to the overhead of a virus scanner because of their behaviour patterns.