We have detected that cookies are not enabled on your browser. Please enable cookies to ensure the proper experience.
Results 1 to 25 of 132

Threaded View

  1. #24
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    1,977
    +Sapience has been kind enough to engage in this discussion and reveal some small details about the makeup of the 2014's Council 'selectioned member sources'

    This leads me to ask:

    1. Did anyone who had their application solicited as the result of a developer or an offer extended based on someone elses nomination (not having applied themselves) decline? [I realize you may not be able to answer this with any degree of certainty until after the 24th.]

    2. Would you be willing to share a rough percentage of the number players you sifted through who make up the following categories: {A.Were Nominated & applied B. Applied but were not nominated. C.Were nominated but did not apply} To be clear. I'm not asking whether or not anyone got multiple nominations on their behalf. I'm wondering what the break down of players you looked at during the nomination process was.

    3. Can you give us an idea of the percentage of applications or nominations that were culled for CS reasons? (Culled by CS [quickly] vs Ones you had to sift through repeatedly.)

    4. Can you tell us what the 'activity' level threshold was used to determine if they were at all eligible based on their playtime in the last 6 months, and what the requirement for continued playtime will be (especially if different) going forward during their term?
    Last edited by Crell_1; Apr 22 2014 at 12:50 PM.
    Crell-L85-Champion - Riddermark ; Swego-L85-Burglar ; Kotvi-L95-Runekeeper
    Delego-L85 Hunter ; Stodden-L51-Captain ; Edhul-L61-Loremaster
    Deglorion - SoA XP Disabler

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

This form's session has expired. You need to reload the page.

Reload